Sep
10
Tucker: Radical Democrats turn on Nancy Pelosi


>>Tucker: GOOD EVENING AND WELCOME TO “TUCKER CARLSON TONIGHT.” ALL RIGHT, TAKE A SEAT, POUR A COCKTAIL. WE ARE ABOUT TO BLOW YOUR MIND. FOR MORE THAN 30 YEARS, NANCY PELOSI AS YOU WELL KNOW HAS REPRESENTED THE SINGLE MOST LIBERAL CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IN AMERICA. SHE HAS ALWAYS BEEN PERFECTLY SUITED FOR THE DROP YOUR NAME THE ISSUE NO MATTER WHAT IT IS, ABORTION, CLIMATE CHANGE, PERMANENT ACTION, CLIMATE CHANGE, NANCY PELOSI HAS THE PAR CHANGE, NANCY PELOSI HAS THE PAY CHANGE, NANCY PELOSI HAS THE PAA CHANGE, NANCY PELOSI HAS THE PAP CHANGE, NANCY PELOSI HAS THE PAO CHANGE, NANCY PELOSI HAS THE PAE CHANGE, NANCY PELOSI HAS THE PAD POSITION ON THAT ISSUE. SHE IS A WALKING LIBERAL STEREOTYPE. OR SO WE THOUGHT. IN FACT, IT WAS ALL A SHAM IDENTITY DESIGNED TO CLOAK A DARKER BLUE REALITY BENEATH DARKER BLUE REALITY BENEAT. HE THOUGHT SHE WAS A LIBERAL WHO ANNUALLY SENDS MONEY TO THE MBR PLEDGE DRIVE, DIDN’T YOU? NO. IN FACT, PELOSI IS A COMMITTED RACIST. A HARDENED BIGOT. SHE WOULD BE RUNNING THE LADIES CLAN IF THEY HAD ONE IN SAN FRANCISCO. HOW DO WE KNOW THIS? SIMPLE. WATCH THE WAY NANCY PELOSI DISMISSES FELLOW CONGRESSWOMAN ALEXANDER ACADIA CORTEZ. IT’S BECAUSE SHE LIKES TO MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HER MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HEC MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HEU MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HES MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HEB MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HET MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HEE MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HEN MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HET MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HEE MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HEM MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HED MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HER MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HET MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HES MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HEA MINIMIZE THE CONFLICT WITHIN HED THE PROGRESSIVES.>>YOU HAVE THESE WINGS, AOC AND HER GROUP ON ONE SIDE.>>IT’S LIKE FIVE PEOPLE.>>Tucker: ACTUALLY, IT’S FOUR PEOPLE. BUT OF COURSE ARE RACIST WILL GET THE NUMBER WRONG. SHE WAS REFERRING TO ALEXANDER ACADIA KERR TO HIS, ILHAN OMAR, OR AS PELOSI DOUBTLESSLY THINKS OF THEM, THE FOUR MORONS OF THE APOCALYPSE. PELOSI DOES NOT LIKE THEM, SHE HAS MADE IT CLEAR. AND OCASIO-CORTEZ THINKS SHE KNOWS WHY. IN A RECENT INTERVIEW WITH “THE WASHINGTON POST,” OCASIO-CORTEZ ACCUSED PELOSI OF “SINGLING OUT A NEWLY ELECTED WOMEN OF COLOR.” GET IT QWEST MARKET YAP. PRESSED TO EXPLAIN HERSELF LATER, OCASIO-CORTEZ NOTED THAT PELOSI HAS ATTACKED THESE WOMEN OF COLOR DESPITE “KNOWING THE AMOUNT OF DEATH THREATS THAT WE GET. I THINK IT IS JUST WORTH ASKING WHY. THAT IS A RHETORICAL QUESTION OBVIOUSLY. SHE KNOWS WHY. WILES WOULD YOU IMPERIL SOMEONE’S SAFETY? BECAUSE YOU WISH THEM HARM. BECAUSE YOU ARE A CRAZED BIGOT! ACCORDING TO ALEXANDER ACADIA CORTEZ, THAT IS WHO IS RUNNING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY RIGHT NOW. QUICK, WE’VE GOT A RACIST THIRD IN LINE FOR THE PRESIDENCY. I THINK WE ARE BEING TOO LITERAL ABOUT THIS. WHAT ARE THE ODDS IN REAL LIFE THAT OCASIO-CORTEZ ACTUALLY BELIEVES THAT NANCY PELOSI IS A RACIST? OR THAT JOE BIDEN IS A RACIST? OR FOR THAT MATTER, DONALD TRUMP IS A RACIST? WHAT ARE THE CHANCES SHE REALLY THINKS THAT? PROBABLY ABOUT ZERO. THE FIRST THING TO KNOW ABOUT THE CRIES OF RACISM YOU HEAR INCESSANTLY FROM THE LEFT, THEY ARE TOTALLY INSINCERE. NO ONE SAYING THAT ACTUALLY BELIEVES IT. THE POINT ISN’T TO GET RID OF RACISM, THE POINT IS TO SEIZE POWER AND IT WORKS. DENOUNCING SOMEONE AS RACIST IS THE KIND OF RHETORICAL STONE GRENADE. FOR THE MOMENT, THE ACCUSED JUST STANDS THERE LOOKING BEWILDERED. THAT IS WHEN YOU SCOOP UP THE LOOT AND RUN. IT IS A SMASH AND GRAB OPERATION AND IT IS HIGHLY EFFECTIVE. IT IS HOW THE LEFT HAS JUSTIFIED ITS ENTIRE CLINICAL PROGRAM, AND THE NAME OF FIGHTING BIGOTRY. AMERICA HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF RACISM THERE FOR WE MUST PICK IT, LEGALIZE, GIVE UP THE FIRST MOMENT, PAY FOR SOMEONE ELSE’S ABORTION, TEAR DOWN OUR BORDERS AND WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO ASK ABOUT CITIZENSHIP ON OUR SENSES BOARD BECAUSE RACISM HERE TO SEE HOW IT WORKS? YEAH. THE QUESTION IS HOW DID NANCY PELOSI FALL FOR THIS? SHE’S BEEN WORKING THE SCAMS ALONG HERSELF YOU THINK SHE WOULD SEE IT COMING BUT APPARENTLY SHE DIDN’T. McDONALD IS THE AUTHOR OF “THE DIVERSITY DELUSION.” SHE JOINS US TONIGHT. ARE YOU SURPRISED HAVING FOLLOWED THIS ARGUMENT FOR SO MANY YEARS SO CLOSELY, ARE YOU SURPRISED THAT PELOSI AND BIDEN ARE BEING DENOUNCED AS RACIST RIGHT NOW?>>COME IT IS HILARIOUS. LET’S TAKE A MOMENT TO SAVOR THIS MOMENT. THE LEFT TURNS ON ITSELF WIELDING THE EXACT WEAPONS IT WIELDS AGAINST EVERYONE ELSE AND ACCUSES ITSELF OF RACISM. IT IS PROSPEROUS BUT IT IS ALSO A DIFFERENT MATTER. I THINK WHAT WE ARE WITNESSING IS THE MOST DANGEROUS IMPORT FROM THE ACADEMY INTO THE REAL WORLD. STUDENTS ARE TAUGHT FROM THE MOMENT THEY ARRIVE ON CAMPUS, TWO THINGS IN TWO THINGS ONLY RELIABLY, WHICH IS THAT THE MOST IMPORTANT THING ABOUT THEMSELVES IS THEIR GROUP IDENTITY DEFINED BY GONADS AND MELANIN, AND THAT RACISM AND SEXISM BASED ON THOSE CHARACTERISTICS ARE THE DEFINING FEATURES OF AMERICAN SOCIETY. TAUGHT TO BELIEVE THAT WHEN THEY FACE ANY KIND OF DISAGREEMENT THEY REFLEXIVELY ACCUSE THEIR IDEOLOGICAL OPPONENTS OF BIGOTRY AND HATE, AND THAT WORKS WONDERFULLY ON A COLLEGE CAMPUS. HE ACCUSED THE PRESIDENT OF RACISM, HE IMMEDIATELY CRUMPLES AND ORDERS ANOTHER MILLION DOLLARS IN DIVERSITY BUREAUCRACY. YOU ACCUSE A CORPORATION OF RACISM AND THE PREPOSTEROUS CLAIM THAT THE BETSY ROSS FLAG AS RACIST. IT WORKS WITH POLITICIAN WITH BIDEN REPUDIATING HIS JUSTIFIED REPORT FOR THE APOSTATE UNITED FOUR CRIME BILL THAT SAVED THOUSANDS OF MINORITY LIVES. THE QUESTION IS, THAT WORK FOR THE REST OF US? AND IF IT DOES, CIVIL SOCIETY IS OVER BECAUSE THIS IS A TOTALITARIAN POWER PLAY, AND ATTEMPT TO SHUT DOWN ANY SORT OF DIALECTICAL SEARCH FOR TRUTH AND TO OCCUPY THE SOUL ALLOWABLE IDEOLOGICAL GROUND. AND THAT IS A RECIPE FOR A SOCIETY TO HALT DEAD IN ITS TRACKS AND GO IN REVERSE.>>Tucker: BECAUSE IT IS NOT REALLY AN ARGUMENT. NOBODY IS MAKING A CASE. BY THE WAY, THIS ELIMINATES THE NEED TO MAKE THE CASE. YOU DON’T ACTUALLY HAVE TO CONVINCE ANYBODY OF ANYTHING IF YOU ARE DOING IT TO FIGHT RACISM, IT’S A MORAL IMPERATIVE AND EVERYONE ELSE CAN SHUT UP AND OBEY.>>THERE HAS BEEN POLITICAL DISAGREEMENTS LONG BEFORE IDENTITY POLITICS. PEOPLE DISAGREE, THAT IS WHAT AMERICA IS ABOUT. THAT WE HAVE THE RIGHT, WE HAVE THE FREEDOM TO DEBATE OUR OPINIONS. THE ALTERNATIVE TO DEBATE IS VIOLENCE. IT IS AN ACT OF NARCISSISM TO THINK THAT EVERYTHING IS ABOUT YOURSELF, TO IMMEDIATELY SAY, WELL IT MUST BE BECAUSE OF MY GENDER AND RACE THAT I’M BEING DISAGREED WITH AND YOU MUST BE A BIGOT TO DISAGREE WITH ME. NO, THAT IS NOT THE CASE. THESE ARE ISSUES THAT DESERVE TO BE FLESHED OUT IN THE PUBLIC FORUM AND IF THEY ARE NOT, WE ARE APPROACHING A TOTALITARIAN STATE VERY QUICKLY.>>Tucker: THIS IS A MUCH LONGER CONVERSATION BUT IN A SHORT TIME, WOULD YOU RECOMMEND — WHAT COURSE OF ACTION FOR NORMAL PEOPLE? IGNORE THESE SLURS FOR THE CYNICAL POLITICS THAT THEY ARE? HOW SHOULD THE AVERAGE PERSON FIGHT BACK AGAINST THIS TOTALITARIANISM? SPEAK OF THE AVERAGE PERSON HAS TO SIMPLY REJECT THE RACISM CHARGE. ALL OF US HAVE TO WORKING ON ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS FOR OUR REALITY. RACISM IS NO LONGER THE PREDOMINANT CHARACTERISTIC OF AMERICA, IF IT EVER WAS. IT WAS A PART OF IT, IT WAS NEVER THE DEFINING FEATURE. BUT IT CERTAINLY IS NOT. THIS STILL REMAINS THE LAND OF OPPORTUNITY. THE ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION IS THAT THERE ARE PROFOUND BEHAVIORAL DIFFERENCES, CHOICES THAT INDIVIDUALS MAKE THAT DETERMINE SOCIAL OUTCOMES. WE HAVE TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST